Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Course 10 Week 2 Main Posting Area

Please place your posts for week 2 here.

33 comments:

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Roger, I am copying the other post here since it was made on Nov. 3, and so that I won't forget to count it for this week. Here is the quote:

"Absolutely God created the earth and all things in it, on it and under it, that is my faith speaking but not without questions. Some reading I have done suggest a period of time between Gen. 1:1 and Gen.1:2 known as "The Gap Theory". Is this relevent to what is being discussed?"

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Yes, it is relavant. While I know there is a textual basis for the gap theory when you compare Isaiah
45:18 with Genesis 1:2, I don't think it is necessary to use it like some do.

That textual basis goes something like this:
In Isaiah, the Bible says God did not create the earth in vain.
"Who did not create it in vain" (Isaiah 45:18). Isaih said that the earth was not Created in vain. Genesis says in chapter 1, verse 2 that "the earth was without form, and void."

I am told the Hebrew word for vain and "form and void." is the same. If that is the case, God did not create the earth (according to Isaiah) like it was in verse 2 in Genesis. So, the speculation is that something happened between veses one and two--a "gap," so to speak.

While I acknowledge that textual basis, I also realize that people could use that for all kinds of things. Some people insert millions of years of time in that gap.

I don't think it is necessary to put millions of years of time there; and I think our "young earth creationist friends" can give credible explanations as to why millions of years do not have to be place there, or anywhere else for that matter." Still, I do have to acknowledge at this point that there is textual basis for using a gap (however large OR SMALL) to harmonize Isaiah and Genesis. That means that, while I don't think long periods of time are necessary there, I do know of some Christians who do place long periods of time there. I do acknowledge that they are indeed Christians :) !

I know the Lord will explain it to us some day.

Tyler Owens said...

The title of my book is THE ART AND CRAFT OF BIBLICAL PREACHING. The general editors are Haddon Robinson and Craig Brian Larson. I will be reading twenty chapters this week.

43.Connecting with Postmoderns
44. Preaching amid Pluralism
45. Connecting with Non-Christians
46. How to Translate Male Sermons to Women
47. He Said, She Said
48. Connecting with Men
49. Creating a Singles-Friendly Sermon
50. Preaching to Preschoolers
51. Hispanic-American Preaching
52. African-American Preaching
53. Asian-American Preaching
54. Work Wins?
55. One Sermon, Two Messages
56. The Playful Preacher
57. What Authority Do We Have Anymore?
58. Why the Sermon?
59. Getting the Gold from the Text
60. Faithful First
61. God's Letter of Intent
62.Five Bird-dogging Questions for Biblical Exposition
63. The Rules of the Game

Tyler Owens said...

Chapter forty-six is about speaking to women and connecting with them. We have to know how women think and use their kind of language. They are not as direct as men are, so we must be conscience of that. There are three ways we can show women we care enough to connect with them. We must translat masculine images into feminine images. We must translate abstract principles into terms of concrete realationships. We also must translate masculine language into feminine language.

Tyler Owens said...

CHapter fifty is about preaching to kids. We must not make it a light thing to do this. We have to ask them real questions, not just "safe" questions. We must use the Word and it is a good idea to use object lessons whenever possible.

roger said...

In Craig Blomberg's book titled: Jesus and the Gospels, I will be reading chapters four and five this week and they are titled:
4. Historical Criticism of the Gospels.
5. Literary Criticism of the Gospels.

roger said...

Muddling through the text of this book is a real challenge for me, the writer writes over my head with all this educated form of writing, guess I'm being critical about this study, I just finished a book on preaching to be understood and then attempt to study this book is my challenge. Maybe this is a lesson in Perseverence?

roger said...

Chapter four is basically a survey of the history of the text invovled, The Gospels, comparing some of the first writings and interpretation of those writings, using thus lower criticisms and higher criticisms.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Roger, you pulled together three of your classes in one comment.

Since the book uses a lot of terminology that is over your head, this might be a good time to try the "word detective" techniques I often have you do before a course is over.

Just read until you come to an unfamiliar word or phrase. Then go to your notebook (or a notecard) and write down your guess as to what it means.

The next time you come to the same word or phrase, see if your guess still fits. If not, refine your guess or come up with an alternate guess.

Chack it out again the next time you come to the word or phrase, and keep doing the process over and over again.

You might have a lot of them in a book such as what you are reading, but you really will grow through the process.

Of course you might not have time to do all that. If not, get the big ideas as well as you can.

On the other hand, you really can learn a lot. I would try to do at least one each time I read if I didn't have time to do it all. After some time of doing this, you can check out your words with a dictionary.

It's the best way I know of to tackle really hard reading.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Tyler, do you remember some of the things we talked about in making distinctions between lower and higher criticisms?

Tyler Owens said...

Chapter fifty-five is about preaching to two different groups in different services. We must preach to traditional type people as well as contemporary folks. We can preach the same message to them. All it takes is some tweaking here and there. We can get away from different styles, but the Word must be the same.

Tyler Owens said...

I am looking forward to Quarterly Meeting this weekend. I hope to see you guys there. I am glad to be a part of it. It is a special thing to me to be part of this Quarterly Meeting. I am glad God called me into it.

roger said...

One thing impresses me about "The Historical Criticism of the Gospels", is the fact that no one person has been studied more and written about as much as Jesus. Think about our history is surrounded by JESUS. The harmony of the gospels I think is unique because of the men whom God allowed to take their role in our history.

roger said...

Hey Tyler, I can see why preaching to women and children can be important and necessary because our church for a long time was basically just that, so would you say that connecting to these and making an influence would give a preacher more success in winning men? Does that make sense?

roger said...

I need to apologize Bro. Randy, I guess I was getting frustrated with all the terminolgy and text of this book. I know that there are jewels to be found in this study,and pray that The Holy Spirit would open my eyes and mind to what he would have me to glean from this. Guess I just needed to vent!! Amen and God Bless you!!!

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Roger,
you didn't have to apologize. I just gave one of our typical "men responses" about how to possibly "fix the problem." Still, I think the word study advice is helpful.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Hey, Guys, help me out. Where is the Quarterly tomorrow night?

roger said...

Criticism, criticism, so many criticisms, comparison is more my word, chapter five talks about studying the Bible simply as literature and applying such characteristics as plot,symbolism, point of view, figure of speech, and so on. This is known as, " Narrative Criticism".Public schools can teach literature of the Bible without promoting a religion using this method.

Tyler Owens said...

The Quarterly Meeting is at Mt. Pleasant.

Tyler Owens said...

I think the answer to your question about whether preaching to women and children would help us preach to men is yes. Men by far our the easiest to preach to. Why? Because we like to have things given to us straight. We like everything in a "nutshell". Women and chidren tend to need more explanation about things.

Tyler Owens said...

Hey, Bro, Roger. I know how you feel about the book you are reading. It is sometimes hard for a simple country boy like me to understand things. Sometimes I wish that I were as smart as some of those guys. I think that God wants to get into books like those because we will have to study more to understand it. This is also the case if we disagree with something that we have read. When this happens, I go directly to the Word. That is a good way for the Lord to compel us to read the Bible more.

Tyler Owens said...

Chapter fifty-nine is a good one. It is about getting riches out of Scripture without sounding like a commentary. The main focus is about staying in text and not trying to get something out of it that it is not about. We have to know what the text is trying to tell us.

roger said...

Thanks Tyler, for the words of encouragement, God Bless!!

roger said...

Most study bibles that I have seen all seem to have a section in the back called "The Harmony of the Gospels". Is there harmony? In a literary criticism there is a form of study known as : The Genre of the Gospels, what I get out of that is a comparison of the Gospels with other types of writtings such as modern biographies, and the writings of the gospels in this way show significent differences such as , The Gospels of Mark and John tell us nothing about the birth of Jesus, so is there harmony, I would have to say yes simply because comparring writings and authors is exactly what your comparring and not the "story".

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Basically my summarization of what I remember about biblical criticism is something like this.

There are two types of criticism: One refers to "lower criticism" or "textual criticism." Basically, this is an attempt to study all of the available manuscripts that we have in order to arrive at a document that most closely gives us the original words of Scripture. That is an admirable thing to do.

Higher criticism, on the other hand, just looks at the bible as though it were any other book. It questions miracles. It tries to give naturalistic explanations for supernatural happenings. I do not think that is a good thing.

So, my oversimplified idea is like this:

Lower criticism or textual criticism = good!

Higher criticism = (generally) bad!

Hope that helps you, Roger. There may be other types of criticam mentioned in your writing, but if you look closely, you will probably be able to see whether they fall into one of the two categories I just mentioned.

Tyler Owens said...

We missed you guys at the Quarterly Meeting. It was a little down in attendance this time. It was still a good time in the Lord. It was good to see all the different ones from the different churches there. We had a good time of fellowship.

roger said...

You know I was thinking this morning about the Gospels and the authors and about them telling the same events but in a different way, and I was thinking about a game we played at Camp Jericho when we would start with one person and retell it to others and at the end the story was miles away than when it started. Do you know the game? Well I'm glad thatafter Matthew,Mark ,Luke, and John finished the story is still the same, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus!!!Amen? Just a thought I had, God Bless you all.

roger said...

Bro. Randy, do I get points from the three studies I commented on, on Nov. 4

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Tyler,

I had already committed to go to my daughter's house in Nashville, TN, this past weekend. Af first, I thought I would be able to go to the Quarterly on Friday night, but we ended up leaving right after (Rhonda's) work on Friday. It did make for a much better trip.

Sorry I missed the quarterly. I do miss the fellowship.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Roger, you will get credit for points on November 4. Where did you post them?

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Oh, do you mean the ones posted right in this posting area. Yes, you get credit for them.

Roger, you got two bonus points for Tuesday and Wednesday, and another one for the question asked before Friday.

Tyler, you received two bonus points for the two or more posts on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Andy Lee said...

I haven't heard about the "Gap Theory" in awhile.....I think there is no scriptural evidence at all that can support a notion that a gap existed between verses 1 and 2....Chalmers was an idiot for even coming up with the idea, I think he was trying to make friends with his evolution buddies. It really doesn't matter, if he would not of came up with this far out idea then we would not have had to waste the time to learn it.

roger said...

It is true that there is no scriptual basis for such a theory but you have to ask why the detailed God that placed the sun just close enough, the detailed God that knows the number of hairs on your head, the detailed God created man in his own image, would create something without form and void. God Bless