This week ill be reading chapter 10: The Historical Jesus-The Quests and the Chronology. And Chapter 11: The Birth and Childhood of Jesus. They sound like pretty good chapters
The quest for the historical Jesus was an interesting chapter. I found it kind of troubling, though. It seemed like it was a way to try and discredit the Bible. What have you learned from this chapter?
Hey Corey, your study talks about the quests of Jesus, were there certain assignments he had to do while living here in this world, requests from God or did he personally have things he wanted to accomplish?
I couldn't honestly read this chapter. Honestly Tyler was right, it did mostly sound like he was trying to discredit the Bible rather than prove it. So I never really got to the point to see what he ment by quest, or I probably skipped it.
But I will try and answer your question with what I think he ment. I think what he ment by quest is a journey to teach, and save. Thats what i think he ment by quest.
And if you think about it the Jesus in the Bible is the 'historical Jesus'. Because the Bible is a history book. There are other views of Jesus like in the Quron they say Jesus didn't die on the cross, rather Judas died on the cross. But we all know thats rediculous.
I guess I could be more specific with why its a history book. One its credibility. As shown in the meany things that would be demeaning back then that bible decided to put in there anyway because its truth, take women finding the tomb of Jesus. And the fact that when the bible said something was there, later in archeology it would be found that it actually was there.
Honestly the Bible is a very amazing book. The more people try to disprove it the more they prove it. (even if u try to seperate the 'historical' Jesus and the 'biblical' Jesus, you will end up seeing the same thing. Sure they sound different but when you get a closer look at someone, they look different, same person but they look different.
I'm sorry how this seems to be coming across sometimes. The "historical Jesus" discussion usually relates to Rudolph Bultmann (and cohorts) attempts to demythologize Scripture. Those are not the postions of Free Will Baptists, and I can assure you that it is not the postion of Free Will Baptist Bible College.
They eveidently are trying to let us know what is going on in the theological world outside of that of Bible-believing Christians. Maybe he is being so objective that it sounds like he supports the view. I'm sure he doesn't, but he is desribing the view so that we can know what is going on. (Actually what went on over 30 years ago, back when I was in seminary.)
Of course I haven't viewed the videos, and I could be mistaken. If so, I have some real concerns along with the rest of you.
Anyway the term, "The Quest for the Historical Jesus" in Theological circles usually related to the attempts of some neo-orthodox (we would call them liberal, which by our definition would be correct, but it would not be technically correct in other uses of the the word) theologians to explain away supernatural elements of the Bible.
You will notice some posts below that relate to various topics of discussion by our online community of preachers.
One of the purposes of Preachers' Meeting is to provide a place for young ministers or those recently called to preach to interact around the principles in a course of study recommended by our local group of preachers in the Southern Illinois area.
We invite you to look in on our conversations. If you would like to add comments as a guest, you are welcome to do so. If this looks interesting to you, you may join us as we start a new session. You can look in the side bar (or sometimes it is moved to right below this post) to see the weekly requirements. We start new courses every 8 or 9 weeks. As already mentioned, you are welcome to comment as a guest before that time.
Below these posts, you will see the word, "comments." Just click on it, and you will see a box on the right side of the screen where you may add your comments.
Look around. Enjoy yourself, and come back often!
Weekly Requirements
Here is a review of the general requirements for each week.
You have three assignments each week
(1) Make at least two initial posts in your posting area. The first one will be the name of the course, and the names (or numbers of the DVD's) of the chapters or lectures you will be covering during the week. The second one will be a comment on one of those chapters. You will receive one point for getting the first post in on Tuesday or Wednesday. You will also get a point for getting at least one more initial post in.
(2) Go to your fellow student's posting areas, and ask them a question or make comments about their intial posts. You will recieve one point for completing this assignment before 12:00 a.m. on Friday morning (that would be before midnight on Thursday).
(3) Answer the questions asked.
(4) On Fridays, I will also give directions for making remaining posts during the week. Be sure and read those, and take them into account when making at least one of your remaining posts.
In all, we want to make at least nine posts during the week. You will receive points for that as follows:
9 or more posts - 12 points
6-8 posts - 10 points
3-5 posts - 6 points
1-2 posts - 3 points
You will have the extra points you had accumulated by getting things in on time. Those are bonus points that will be used only to move your grade closer to 100 if you need them. They will be awarded each week if needed to move your grade up to 12 for the week. If you do not need them for that week, they will be carried over to the next week(s). Remember the posts that count for points will be at least three sentences long.
Thoughts on Application
Roger gave some good thoughts on application:
"Chapter 75, titled: 'Apply Within' is a lesson in application. The writer explains why it is sometimes difficult applying a sermon to real life situations. I will list some of the reasons application is not applied to our lives.
"First it is "hard work", it is hard to find application to every situation in the congregation,
"second, is wrong assumptions, assuming the audience is able to apply any and all biblical truths is totally a wrong assumption,
"third, is fear, fear of being to deep or to simplistic in the text and failing at application, and then there is training or lack thereof,
"many preachers know the text, and the history and the order of things but are totally untrained in application. One gentleman said it this way," how can you be a good football player when you can pass the ball, or when you can kick the ball, or when you can run with the ball but you don't know the rules of the game."
If you live in the souther Illinois area, we would like to invite you to a Couples' Marriage Enrichment Seminar on Saturday, February 27. It starts at 6:00 p.m and will run to 9:00 p.m.
After the welcome, there will be a dinner. Then there will be an opening session, followed by two breakout sessions, then a short closing.
The Keynote Speaker is Dr. Randy Carney (That's me :)!) and Roger and Janet Dutton will be speaking during the breakout sessions (That's Roger, who is commenting on this blog during this term!). Randy and Rhonda (my wife!) Carney will also have a breakout session discussing "Keys to Marital Bliss."
The Keynote Address will be on the topic of "The Way to a Successful Marriage: The Shocking and Surprising Truth."
Roger and Janet will be talking about "Hope for Restoring your marriage."
The cost is $15.00 per couple and that includes a dinner and all seminar materials. A nursery and childcare will be available. (Please indicate that you need these services when you register.) A book table with resources from Handfuls on Purpose Christian Bookstore will be available.
The seminar is for couples of all ages, ranging from newlyweds to marriage veterans!
To register, call 618-627-2228 to let the church know how may will be attending. Payment can be made at the event. (Make checks to TFBC.) For more information, call the church at 618-627-2228.
The Greatest Love
Since Valentine's Day falls on Sunday this year, I imagine there will be a ton of sermons going out on the topic of love.
Paul talked about love and respect in marriage (Ephesians 5), but he was really saying that that was an illustration of the relationship between Christ and the church.
Christ
Left Heaven to come to this earth.
He
Overcame adversity while here. He even conquered death!
He
Valued mankind so much that He gave Himself on the cross.
He desires fellowship with us. He reconciled the world to Himself, so that people could have an
Intimate realtionship with Him.
He meets all of our
Needs.
He is the supreme example of
Giving.
Do you see the word, LOVING, there? That is what He is--our LOVING Savior! Because of that, we should love one another.
Course 11 Week 4
Scroll down to the week 4 area to begin commenting.
Dealing with the Closed American Mind
One of the chapters Roger is reading is entitled, (something like) "Dealing with the Closed American Mind." I don't know if it is mentioned in the chapter, but I suspect that if you tak about something where a person has a felt need, you can gain their hearing somewhat.
What are your thoughts?
You may scroll down and comment in the week 3 comments area. Visitors are welcome to comment also.
Connecting with Postmoderns
This is something most preachers do every Sunday. If you have young unchurched visitors in your church, you will be trying to reach postmoderns. Even some of your church youth are more influenced by postmodernism than by their previous Sunday school teaching.
Here is my reply to one of Roger's posts:
"Roger, what tips stand out to you for commecting with postmoderns? I think the term modern referred to an age in history that related to new thoughts in science, etc. (If I am off base, refresh my memory.) Post modern refers to the time following that era. Connecting with postmoderns is something you have to do, whether you realize it or not, almost every time you preach."
I will post some of his answers here if he sees the question in time.
Preaching--Proclamation of God's Word
Preaching, by one definition, is the proclamation of God's Word. As such, a person, can take the Scriptural passage and find some of its main points and emphasize those points.
While I believe we should learn all we can about the grammatical construction of the words of Scripture, and that we should learn all we can about the historical setting for when those words were originally spoken; the nice thing about proclaiming the Word is that you can just take what the text says and emphasize it. Then the Word will not return void.
People with all different types of backgrounds have been called to preach throughout the centuries. Some very "unlearned" (as the world would put it) men have had great results by simply taking the main ideas of Scripture and simply emphasizing them. As long as we do not twist the meaning, this simply shows the amazing power of the Word of God.
New Format
I am going to try putting my comments for each day in this left sidebar. The comments areas for the remaining weeks are displayed to the right. That is where you will place your comments for each week.
10 comments:
This week ill be reading chapter 10: The Historical Jesus-The Quests and the Chronology. And Chapter 11: The Birth and Childhood of Jesus. They sound like pretty good chapters
The quest for the historical Jesus was an interesting chapter. I found it kind of troubling, though. It seemed like it was a way to try and discredit the Bible. What have you learned from this chapter?
Hey Corey, your study talks about the quests of Jesus, were there certain assignments he had to do while living here in this world, requests from God or did he personally have things he wanted to accomplish?
Hello Corey, your ch 10 does sound interesting. I never thought of Jesus being on a quest. Does the author explain what he means by quests?
I couldn't honestly read this chapter. Honestly Tyler was right, it did mostly sound like he was trying to discredit the Bible rather than prove it. So I never really got to the point to see what he ment by quest, or I probably skipped it.
But I will try and answer your question with what I think he ment. I think what he ment by quest is a journey to teach, and save. Thats what i think he ment by quest.
And if you think about it the Jesus in the Bible is the 'historical Jesus'. Because the Bible is a history book. There are other views of Jesus like in the Quron they say Jesus didn't die on the cross, rather Judas died on the cross. But we all know thats rediculous.
I guess I could be more specific with why its a history book. One its credibility. As shown in the meany things that would be demeaning back then that bible decided to put in there anyway because its truth, take women finding the tomb of Jesus. And the fact that when the bible said something was there, later in archeology it would be found that it actually was there.
Honestly the Bible is a very amazing book. The more people try to disprove it the more they prove it. (even if u try to seperate the 'historical' Jesus and the 'biblical' Jesus, you will end up seeing the same thing. Sure they sound different but when you get a closer look at someone, they look different, same person but they look different.
I'm sorry how this seems to be coming across sometimes. The "historical Jesus" discussion usually relates to Rudolph Bultmann (and cohorts) attempts to demythologize Scripture. Those are not the postions of Free Will Baptists, and I can assure you that it is not the postion of Free Will Baptist Bible College.
They eveidently are trying to let us know what is going on in the theological world outside of that of Bible-believing Christians. Maybe he is being so objective that it sounds like he supports the view. I'm sure he doesn't, but he is desribing the view so that we can know what is going on. (Actually what went on over 30 years ago, back when I was in seminary.)
Of course I haven't viewed the videos, and I could be mistaken. If so, I have some real concerns along with the rest of you.
Anyway the term, "The Quest for the Historical Jesus" in Theological circles usually related to the attempts of some neo-orthodox (we would call them liberal, which by our definition would be correct, but it would not be technically correct in other uses of the the word) theologians to explain away supernatural elements of the Bible.
Post a Comment