Monday, May 4, 2009

Course 7 Week 6 Corey's Topics

You may use this Tuesday morning (after midnight tonight).

10 comments:

Corey G. said...

This week ill be reading chapter 10: The Historical Jesus-The Quests and the Chronology. And Chapter 11: The Birth and Childhood of Jesus. They sound like pretty good chapters

Tyler Owens said...

The quest for the historical Jesus was an interesting chapter. I found it kind of troubling, though. It seemed like it was a way to try and discredit the Bible. What have you learned from this chapter?

roger said...

Hey Corey, your study talks about the quests of Jesus, were there certain assignments he had to do while living here in this world, requests from God or did he personally have things he wanted to accomplish?

sremery said...

Hello Corey, your ch 10 does sound interesting. I never thought of Jesus being on a quest. Does the author explain what he means by quests?

Corey G. said...

I couldn't honestly read this chapter. Honestly Tyler was right, it did mostly sound like he was trying to discredit the Bible rather than prove it. So I never really got to the point to see what he ment by quest, or I probably skipped it.

Corey G. said...

But I will try and answer your question with what I think he ment. I think what he ment by quest is a journey to teach, and save. Thats what i think he ment by quest.

Corey G. said...

And if you think about it the Jesus in the Bible is the 'historical Jesus'. Because the Bible is a history book. There are other views of Jesus like in the Quron they say Jesus didn't die on the cross, rather Judas died on the cross. But we all know thats rediculous.

Corey G. said...

I guess I could be more specific with why its a history book. One its credibility. As shown in the meany things that would be demeaning back then that bible decided to put in there anyway because its truth, take women finding the tomb of Jesus. And the fact that when the bible said something was there, later in archeology it would be found that it actually was there.

Corey G. said...

Honestly the Bible is a very amazing book. The more people try to disprove it the more they prove it. (even if u try to seperate the 'historical' Jesus and the 'biblical' Jesus, you will end up seeing the same thing. Sure they sound different but when you get a closer look at someone, they look different, same person but they look different.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

I'm sorry how this seems to be coming across sometimes. The "historical Jesus" discussion usually relates to Rudolph Bultmann (and cohorts) attempts to demythologize Scripture. Those are not the postions of Free Will Baptists, and I can assure you that it is not the postion of Free Will Baptist Bible College.

They eveidently are trying to let us know what is going on in the theological world outside of that of Bible-believing Christians. Maybe he is being so objective that it sounds like he supports the view. I'm sure he doesn't, but he is desribing the view so that we can know what is going on. (Actually what went on over 30 years ago, back when I was in seminary.)

Of course I haven't viewed the videos, and I could be mistaken. If so, I have some real concerns along with the rest of you.

Anyway the term, "The Quest for the Historical Jesus" in Theological circles usually related to the attempts of some neo-orthodox (we would call them liberal, which by our definition would be correct, but it would not be technically correct in other uses of the the word) theologians to explain away supernatural elements of the Bible.