Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Week 7 Posts

Tyler, please post your initial comments here. Sean, please respond to Tyler's comments here. (Responses count as quality comments as well as initial posts.) All of us, have fun commenting here when we know our required comments have been posted.

Visitors are welcome to join the discussion by clicking on the word "comments" below.

22 comments:

Tyler Owens said...

The title of my book is THE NEW TESTAMENT: ITS BACKGROUND AND MESSAGE. The authors are Thomas D. Lea and David Alan black. There are going to be two chapters this week.

21. The Epistles of 1 and 2 Peter

22. The Johannine Epistles

Tyler

Tyler Owens said...

Chapter twenty-one talks about the epistles of 1 and 2 Peter. They are mostly about christian suffering . Peter wanted his readers to remember why they must suffer. They must suffer because Jesus told the disciples that they would suffer for His name. Some sholars think that 2 Peter was not written by the apostle himself, but I disagree because Peter speaks of the first book in his second letter. What do you guys think?

Tyler

Dr. Randy Carney said...

See my comment in the other section (Week 2 A).

Dr. Randy Carney said...

I always thought Peter wrote the books that bear his name.

Some writers did use an "amanuensis" which is someone who wrote down the words of another. That would still mean the one doing the dictating was the author, however.

sremery said...

I hadn't really gave it a whole lot of thought, but I read in one of my study bibles that there were ones who thought 2 Peter was written by someone else. It says it was authored near the time of his death so they beleived it was maybe written by a scribe that he was dictating to. Also it said that because there were similarities in Jude that there might be some suspicion.
I know these books were canonized and they were written by people (spirit inspired) who lived close to when Jesus was alive, but have you read anything other than the bible you think could be canonized? And I'm not necessarily meaning the Gnostics. Anything up to today? I dont know if I have but was just something that popped in my head.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Wow, Sean, provocative question.

I think that the way the Holy spirit brought about the recognition of Scripture causes the process of canonization to be closed in that what we have in Sripture is complete as the written revelation of God, His principles for living, and the complete plan of salvation.

One of the things that has characterized cults throughout history is thier attempts to add new revelation or to add books and writings that they say are equally inspired as Scripture. The Book of Mormon would be an example. They even describe it in their television advertisements as "another testament of Jesus Christ."

On the other hand, we don't mean to say tht the Lord no longer speaks. It's just that the Bible is the "measurig reed" (like a yard stick or ruler) by which we judge newer writings.

The Lord may "inspire" new writings in the sense that He motivates the writer to write them, but I do not think that process is the same as what He did in forming Scripture. In that process, He superintended the writings in such a way that what ended up (even every word) expressed exactly what He wanted said.

So, since canonization of Scripture is a historical event that acknowledged what the early Christians already recognized as Scripture, in that sense, I would say there are no new writings that should be "canonized" at least in that sense.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Here is a repeat of my earlier comment dealing with canonization and inspiration of Scripture.

What was the process of inspiration like?

Here is an example that I presented in the class "Sifting Sensibly: The Thinking Man's Guide to Biblical Faith."

"Someone may say, upon reading the different books of the Bible, the different authors write with different styles. How can the claim be that these are all God's words. A comparison would be to view an imaginary business, say a lawyer's office. Perhaps the lawyer has a legal brief he needs to present. He also is very busy, so he looks around his law firm and finds a third-year law student and gives him the assignment to write the legal brief. The lawyer tells the student the arguments he wants presented, but he leaves it with the student for the actual writing. After the student works on the brief, he gives it back to the lawyer. Up to this point, the style is completely the student's. The lawyer reads the brief very carefully. He finds many sentences written by the student that express the ideas he wants to put forth. Sometimes he will find a word that is not strong enough, so he will cross out that word and replace it with his own. At other times, he replaces entire sentences or paragraphs with his own wording. Sometimes he will give input and ask the student to rewrite a certain section. Finally the brief is finished when the lawyer approves it. At this point, the brief is no longer the student's. It is now the lawyer's. Some of it will contain style or flavoring that is unique to the student, but the lawyer claims responsibility for what is said in the entire draft. The brief, then represents exactly what the lawyer wants communicated."

I believe the process of the inspiration of Scripture was similar. God superintended the process in such a way that when His servant had in his mind a certain wording of the truth that God wanted communicated, and God in effect said, "Yes, that's what I want expressed," He allowed the writer to write down those very words. That accounts for different human "styles." However, when His servant came up with something contrary to what God wanted expressed (at least in the case of Scripture writing) God replaced what the human would have written with an exact word that He chose. The end result was that what was written as Scripture was exactly what and how God wanted it expressed. Also, in some cases, the wording carried the style of the human writers because they expressed what God wanted said in an acceptable way based on the idea that God placed in their minds.

Anyway, I hope you enjoyed your study of the canon of Scripture.

sremery said...

Thanks for the response, I too believe that Bible does say all that God needs to say to help us thru life. I also believe he speaks in his creation and in other people or thru them. I guess I was thinking about when I found out that the Bible was assembled by men, it made me think, how could've they been sure, and if they knew the impact it would have on the world. I would like to clarify that I do believe that the Bible is Gods Word (all of it). But, until you read it in spirit, I can see where a person could wonder. Also, I don't know the whole story on the assembling of the Bible, so I'm speculating a litte.

Tyler Owens said...

Some people think that all preachers should be loud and "fired up". i disagree with this. Some of the most powerful sermons that I have heard have been delivered softly. I also know some people who think that a preacher should never get loud at all. I disagree with this also. I don't really concern myself with the volume as long as the preaching is good. I have to admit,though, I tend to get a litle loud when I preach. I am writng this just to start some conversation about some of your most memorable messages, preachers, or even messages that you have preached. Is there someone whom you really look up to? There are three that I always like to hear-Billy Graham, John Hagee, and David Jeremiah. I look forward to reading what you guys post on this subject.

Tyler

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Some I would add to the list are: Charles Stanley, and two who have gone on to be with the Lord--D. James Kennedy, and Adrian Rogers. D. James Kennedy's insights were always well thought out. Adrian Rogers had an excellent command of the use of variety in his voice to communicate. If you hear a replay of one of his sermons, make it a point to see how he varies his volume,rate and pitch as he speaks.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

You mentioned that one of the themes that Peter emphasizes has to do with suffering. How does suffering play a part in shaping indiviuals that God can use?

sremery said...

I also like the ones you both have mentioned. One that I like to watch is Joel Osteen. He's good at encouraging and uses the Word to do it. Ones I enjoy reading is Rob Bell and Donald Miller. I also read a lot of Spurgeon, I go to a web site that has all of his sermons catagorized by scripture, if I'm into a certain part of Bible, I will usually look up a sermon he said on it. I believe its called spurgeongems if you ever want to check it out.

sremery said...

I've thought about why suffering exists alot. I really cant grasp the thought of how life would be without it. Its such a big part of life in general. What I have learned through my own experiences is that if we let it, it brings you closer to God in a way that I dont know it could've if it hadn't of happened. I know somewhere in the Bible it says its a privilege to suffer for Christ and I understand what they are meaning about that. I'm speaking more of why we suffer physically or mentally. I've spoken to a friend with MS and is wheelcahir bound about this. He doesnt have a definite answer but he brings up that we have a hope that he wont be in that chair when he leaves here. He also knows God still uses him now. He also quoted Rom 8:37 Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. This goes on to tell us how nothing can seperate us from God if we put our trust in Him. So he gives us Hope, which is essential in dealing with suffering.

Tyler Owens said...

I would also like to add something about suffering. I read a book one time that I can't seem to remember the name of it that said that sometimes God allows us to suffer in order to make us lean more on Him. This is an interesting point. I have had some things happen to me that make me wonder about this. I also have tried different things to try to help me in these situations, but they never do. That is when all we have left to do is lean totally on God. You know what- that is when it seems to be the only thing that helps.

Tyler

Tyler Owens said...

Randy- I also need to tell you that I have a new e-mail address. It is taowens022804@verizon.net

Tyler

Tyler Owens said...

Chapter twenty-two talks about te epistles of 1,2,and 3 John. I think that the purpose of 1 John, he wanted to provide a foundation for the assurance of salvation and he wanted to warn of false teachers. 1 John gave three tests to identify those who belonged to God-
1. Right belief- the person had to believe that Jesus had come in the flesh.
2. Right behavior- demanded rightious living
3. Right attitude- demande evidence of love for people
John kept repeating these tests throughout 1 John. 2 and 3 John were for specific resons in the church and to certain people

Tyler

Tyler Owens said...

This has been a rough week for me. I am having trouble at work adjusting to the heat. Also, this wrist injury has been causing a lot of trouble. I am going to be delivering the message on this coming Sunday morning, so I haven't been putting much time into my lessons that I would like to. I'm trying not to sound like I'm complaining, but I feel like I can confide in you guys. You'll never know haw important this daily blog is for me. God Bless You!

Tyler

sremery said...

I've been praying for you, Jason, and Josh for your sermons this week. I'm sure you'll do fine. See you Sun morn.

sremery said...

Good Morning Tyler, I pray peace & comfort on you this morning. I have found Sat. mornings to be when I "feel" closer to God. I'm sure its different with other people. I think its because I dont have to think about work as much, and my mind is more receptive.

Good Morning Randy, Thanks for the work you do on this website and for our organization. You inpsire me.

sremery said...

I need "inspired" to spell better. I notice I have a lot of typos. Sorry. But you do inspire me Randy.

Dr. Randy Carney said...

Thanks, Sean,

I am praying for all of you too. You both inspire and encourage me.

Randy

Tyler Owens said...

I am grateful for your prayers. I also like Saturday mornings because it is one day closer to Sunday. When it comes to Sundays and Wednesdays, I find that I am so excited that I can hardly sit still. I just can't wait for church so I can worship God with my brothers and sisters. I just expect something to happen when I go to church!

Tyler