Sean, Please place your initial posts and answers to our questions here. Tyler, please put one or more questions for Sean here. Visitors, click on the word, "comments." to join our discussion.
The title of my course is Old Testament Survey: Poetry and Prophecy. The instructor is Dr. Garnett Reid. I'll watch 4 classes this week.I assume I'll be studying Song of Solomen this week.
Hey guys. I am also glad to be home from the trip to Branson. I really enjoyed this trip. The youth were having a good time as well as the adults that went. I was glad to see all those kids praising God.
Session 17 is about the Song of Solomon. I find it interesting that it would be called Song of Songs, meaning its the greatest of all songs. He mentions that some believe that its a group of different songs. I not sure how they come to this, it seems like to me that it is one story. The instructor gives examples of unity in it. One reason is that it has the same characters throughout.
He also discusses that it is viewed as being allegorical. He talks about how that it can be dangerous in viewing things like this. He says that theres no limit on the subjectivity in it. He warns of using things in the Bible as symbols for other things without anything to back it up.But I think of Sng of Solomon as a story of Gods love for us, it makes sense to me especially after reading the Bible as a whole.
I think the way to use what we call "spiritualizing" is to use other Scripture to back up the spiritual analogies we draw from a statement or even. Sometimes, we can say, "The primary historical meaning of this passage is . . . , but it reminds me of . . . . (something that is clearly taught in Scripture--we can even show where that support is). Then go on to talk about the possible allegorical, metaphorical, or spirualized message.
This is a way of using analogy where you compare one thing with another. Just make sure both ideas have biblical support even if they appear in different parts of Scripture. Also, be careful of saying that this is exactly what the original Scripture (the one you are making a comparison to) intended. I mean be careful of saying the original Scripture intended to produce the analogy you picked out.
I heard a message one time about the book of Ecclesiastes. The preacher used the part about him looking through the lattice. The lattice was the separation we have from God. In other words, the lattice is sin. God can see us, but we have built a "lattice" between us and Him. I just thought that was interesting to tell you guys about.
Good Morning, sorry I havent posted much lately, I've been working on our barn. Its not very often I get 2 whole days to just do what I want to. My guess on what existentialism means is that you believe that we are just being.
Here is one description of it: In existentialism, the individual's starting point is characterized by what has been called "the existential attitude," or a sense of disorientation and confusion in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world. Here is another: A twentieth-century philosophical movement emphasizing the uniqueness of each human existence in freely making its self-defining choices, with foundations in the thought of Soren Kierkegaard (1813-55) and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and notably represented in the works of Karl Jaspers (1883-1969), Gabriel Marcel (1887-1973), Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), and Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-80).
"A twentieth-century philosophical movement emphasizing the uniqueness of each human existence in freely making its self-defining choices"--this sounds good as related to the part of Free Will for Free Will Baptist :) !
The reference to Friedrich Nietzsche raises a little red flag because of some of the other things he taught.
Another person, if I remember correctly, that used the term of Existentialism quite a bit was Rudolph Bultmann. He was a "neo-orthodox" theologian.
I think the way to filter the term and relate it to our understanding of the Bible is to use the aspects of it that relate to experience, especially related to free choice; and to make sure that we maintain our commitment to Scripture over experience. (Experience is fine if it is in harmony with Scripture).
You will notice some posts below that relate to various topics of discussion by our online community of preachers.
One of the purposes of Preachers' Meeting is to provide a place for young ministers or those recently called to preach to interact around the principles in a course of study recommended by our local group of preachers in the Southern Illinois area.
We invite you to look in on our conversations. If you would like to add comments as a guest, you are welcome to do so. If this looks interesting to you, you may join us as we start a new session. You can look in the side bar (or sometimes it is moved to right below this post) to see the weekly requirements. We start new courses every 8 or 9 weeks. As already mentioned, you are welcome to comment as a guest before that time.
Below these posts, you will see the word, "comments." Just click on it, and you will see a box on the right side of the screen where you may add your comments.
Look around. Enjoy yourself, and come back often!
Weekly Requirements
Here is a review of the general requirements for each week.
You have three assignments each week
(1) Make at least two initial posts in your posting area. The first one will be the name of the course, and the names (or numbers of the DVD's) of the chapters or lectures you will be covering during the week. The second one will be a comment on one of those chapters. You will receive one point for getting the first post in on Tuesday or Wednesday. You will also get a point for getting at least one more initial post in.
(2) Go to your fellow student's posting areas, and ask them a question or make comments about their intial posts. You will recieve one point for completing this assignment before 12:00 a.m. on Friday morning (that would be before midnight on Thursday).
(3) Answer the questions asked.
(4) On Fridays, I will also give directions for making remaining posts during the week. Be sure and read those, and take them into account when making at least one of your remaining posts.
In all, we want to make at least nine posts during the week. You will receive points for that as follows:
9 or more posts - 12 points
6-8 posts - 10 points
3-5 posts - 6 points
1-2 posts - 3 points
You will have the extra points you had accumulated by getting things in on time. Those are bonus points that will be used only to move your grade closer to 100 if you need them. They will be awarded each week if needed to move your grade up to 12 for the week. If you do not need them for that week, they will be carried over to the next week(s). Remember the posts that count for points will be at least three sentences long.
Thoughts on Application
Roger gave some good thoughts on application:
"Chapter 75, titled: 'Apply Within' is a lesson in application. The writer explains why it is sometimes difficult applying a sermon to real life situations. I will list some of the reasons application is not applied to our lives.
"First it is "hard work", it is hard to find application to every situation in the congregation,
"second, is wrong assumptions, assuming the audience is able to apply any and all biblical truths is totally a wrong assumption,
"third, is fear, fear of being to deep or to simplistic in the text and failing at application, and then there is training or lack thereof,
"many preachers know the text, and the history and the order of things but are totally untrained in application. One gentleman said it this way," how can you be a good football player when you can pass the ball, or when you can kick the ball, or when you can run with the ball but you don't know the rules of the game."
If you live in the souther Illinois area, we would like to invite you to a Couples' Marriage Enrichment Seminar on Saturday, February 27. It starts at 6:00 p.m and will run to 9:00 p.m.
After the welcome, there will be a dinner. Then there will be an opening session, followed by two breakout sessions, then a short closing.
The Keynote Speaker is Dr. Randy Carney (That's me :)!) and Roger and Janet Dutton will be speaking during the breakout sessions (That's Roger, who is commenting on this blog during this term!). Randy and Rhonda (my wife!) Carney will also have a breakout session discussing "Keys to Marital Bliss."
The Keynote Address will be on the topic of "The Way to a Successful Marriage: The Shocking and Surprising Truth."
Roger and Janet will be talking about "Hope for Restoring your marriage."
The cost is $15.00 per couple and that includes a dinner and all seminar materials. A nursery and childcare will be available. (Please indicate that you need these services when you register.) A book table with resources from Handfuls on Purpose Christian Bookstore will be available.
The seminar is for couples of all ages, ranging from newlyweds to marriage veterans!
To register, call 618-627-2228 to let the church know how may will be attending. Payment can be made at the event. (Make checks to TFBC.) For more information, call the church at 618-627-2228.
The Greatest Love
Since Valentine's Day falls on Sunday this year, I imagine there will be a ton of sermons going out on the topic of love.
Paul talked about love and respect in marriage (Ephesians 5), but he was really saying that that was an illustration of the relationship between Christ and the church.
Christ
Left Heaven to come to this earth.
He
Overcame adversity while here. He even conquered death!
He
Valued mankind so much that He gave Himself on the cross.
He desires fellowship with us. He reconciled the world to Himself, so that people could have an
Intimate realtionship with Him.
He meets all of our
Needs.
He is the supreme example of
Giving.
Do you see the word, LOVING, there? That is what He is--our LOVING Savior! Because of that, we should love one another.
Course 11 Week 4
Scroll down to the week 4 area to begin commenting.
Dealing with the Closed American Mind
One of the chapters Roger is reading is entitled, (something like) "Dealing with the Closed American Mind." I don't know if it is mentioned in the chapter, but I suspect that if you tak about something where a person has a felt need, you can gain their hearing somewhat.
What are your thoughts?
You may scroll down and comment in the week 3 comments area. Visitors are welcome to comment also.
Connecting with Postmoderns
This is something most preachers do every Sunday. If you have young unchurched visitors in your church, you will be trying to reach postmoderns. Even some of your church youth are more influenced by postmodernism than by their previous Sunday school teaching.
Here is my reply to one of Roger's posts:
"Roger, what tips stand out to you for commecting with postmoderns? I think the term modern referred to an age in history that related to new thoughts in science, etc. (If I am off base, refresh my memory.) Post modern refers to the time following that era. Connecting with postmoderns is something you have to do, whether you realize it or not, almost every time you preach."
I will post some of his answers here if he sees the question in time.
Preaching--Proclamation of God's Word
Preaching, by one definition, is the proclamation of God's Word. As such, a person, can take the Scriptural passage and find some of its main points and emphasize those points.
While I believe we should learn all we can about the grammatical construction of the words of Scripture, and that we should learn all we can about the historical setting for when those words were originally spoken; the nice thing about proclaiming the Word is that you can just take what the text says and emphasize it. Then the Word will not return void.
People with all different types of backgrounds have been called to preach throughout the centuries. Some very "unlearned" (as the world would put it) men have had great results by simply taking the main ideas of Scripture and simply emphasizing them. As long as we do not twist the meaning, this simply shows the amazing power of the Word of God.
New Format
I am going to try putting my comments for each day in this left sidebar. The comments areas for the remaining weeks are displayed to the right. That is where you will place your comments for each week.
12 comments:
The title of my course is Old Testament Survey: Poetry and Prophecy. The instructor is Dr. Garnett Reid. I'll watch 4 classes this week.I assume I'll be studying Song of Solomen this week.
We're back from Branson. It was a successful trip in that no one was lost. Even though I didnt sleep much, it was refreshing for me.
Hey guys. I am also glad to be home from the trip to Branson. I really enjoyed this trip. The youth were having a good time as well as the adults that went. I was glad to see all those kids praising God.
Glad you all had a good trip!
Session 17 is about the Song of Solomon.
I find it interesting that it would be called Song of Songs, meaning its the greatest of all songs.
He mentions that some believe that its a group of different songs. I not sure how they come to this, it seems like to me that it is one story. The instructor gives examples of unity in it. One reason is that it has the same characters throughout.
He also discusses that it is viewed as being allegorical. He talks about how that it can be dangerous in viewing things like this. He says that theres no limit on the subjectivity in it. He warns of using things in the Bible as symbols for other things without anything to back it up.But I think of Sng of Solomon as a story of Gods love for us, it makes sense to me especially after reading the Bible as a whole.
Sean,
I think the way to use what we call "spiritualizing" is to use other Scripture to back up the spiritual analogies we draw from a statement or even. Sometimes, we can say, "The primary historical meaning of this passage is . . . , but it reminds me of . . . . (something that is clearly taught in Scripture--we can even show where that support is). Then go on to talk about the possible allegorical, metaphorical, or spirualized message.
This is a way of using analogy where you compare one thing with another. Just make sure both ideas have biblical support even if they appear in different parts of Scripture. Also, be careful of saying that this is exactly what the original Scripture (the one you are making a comparison to) intended. I mean be careful of saying the original Scripture intended to produce the analogy you picked out.
I heard a message one time about the book of Ecclesiastes. The preacher used the part about him looking through the lattice. The lattice was the separation we have from God. In other words, the lattice is sin. God can see us, but we have built a "lattice" between us and Him. I just thought that was interesting to tell you guys about.
Thanks for the lattice insight, Tyler.
Good Morning, sorry I havent posted much lately, I've been working on our barn. Its not very often I get 2 whole days to just do what I want to. My guess on what existentialism means is that you believe that we are just being.
Here is one description of it: In existentialism, the individual's starting point is characterized by what has been called "the existential attitude," or a sense of disorientation and confusion in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd world.
Here is another: A twentieth-century philosophical movement emphasizing the uniqueness of each human existence in freely making its self-defining choices, with foundations in the thought of Soren Kierkegaard (1813-55) and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and notably represented in the works of Karl Jaspers (1883-1969), Gabriel Marcel (1887-1973), Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), and Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-80).
Sean,
Thanks for delving into existentialism so deeply.
"A twentieth-century philosophical movement emphasizing the uniqueness of each human existence in freely making its self-defining choices"--this sounds good as related to the part of Free Will for Free Will Baptist :) !
The reference to Friedrich Nietzsche raises a little red flag because of some of the other things he taught.
Another person, if I remember correctly, that used the term of Existentialism quite a bit was Rudolph Bultmann. He was a "neo-orthodox" theologian.
I think the way to filter the term and relate it to our understanding of the Bible is to use the aspects of it that relate to experience, especially related to free choice; and to make sure that we maintain our commitment to Scripture over experience. (Experience is fine if it is in harmony with Scripture).
Post a Comment